Is All Nationalism Bad?
Rocking MrE gives us a run-down on things we have stated before, as to how Post-War (I and II), ‘nationalism’ became the scapegoat, and modern internationalist and globalist idealogues began to shape the era. However, as he says, it was not nationalism, that caused World War II, but the overgrowth in statism ruled by socialism.
The tendency of many of the modern left, e.g., their support of “open door policy,” is to promote a plan, that is not theirs, but designed by others, whose policies will fail, are failing, and will not benefit your country. It is the ideal of a future federalist pan-European superstate, with open borders, single currency, and military — i.e., a ‘United States of Europe,’ analogous to the United States of America, Some of the thinkers, whom I admire, sought the same ideal, but it is their spirit I like, and not their political ideology of cosmopolitan internationalism. There are many grand ideals, and yet, the same politicians and bureaucrats do not even know how to successfully run a small village, community, a town, a city, nor the single nation-state, rushing the process, while citizens sleep at night, into this era of superstate. When you research how things came together, it is thievery.
Thievery of the people’s sovereignty, and democratic decision, of policies they have not asked for.
Those who think “nationalism” is an unmitigated “evil,” that should be phased out, are now greatly influential, and in power. The denunciations of ours, makes them smile and laugh. The modern left, have made nationalism an evil to be purged, like “the patriarchy.” The prevalence in young minds of an attitude, that makes them reject their own heritage and history is growing, but little do they know the machinations underlying the policies and agenda, and the political outlook of the founders of these global organisations. Many people may not be aware of these issues, as the Left deliberately avoid analysing them. Journalists and countries are deliberately planning how to address issues to the populace, who and who not to give legitimacy to by lying and editing their interviews and viewpoints. They say, it is to deter the growth of “islamophobia,” and xenophobia. What they’re really doing is just covering for the establishment agenda. The association these elections of the Right, or those whom disagree with the agenda and ideology with every pejorative, national socialism and fascismo extremely blurs the lines of ideology.
Now, both Giuseppe Mazzini and Oswald Mosley held such ideal of cosmopolitan internationalism. Fine, but it is certainly the history of the Paneuropean ideal, and the European Parliament, that we rightfully and staunchly have remained sceptical of, and myself since I first began interest in the political arena. We cannot support their policies, and ideal. Mazzini’s republicanism was also a spiritual philosophy, and then, so is fascism. Yet, the same academics, whom surmised that Mazzini was a precursor to fascism, which is also a spiritual philosophy, are the same internationalists promoting Pan-Europe, and stating internationalism is based on spiritual and biological facts, such as Christian Lous Lang. They inject these elements into it, to give it validity, and prestige.
The national socialists were the same in their imperialism, except they merely found the Jew and “Jewry,” to be in the way, as national socialist ideology extended beyond the Reich, and included many people, e.g., certain Africans, the Turks, Arabs, etc. There are people whom have already pointed out the hypocrisy, that there are Jews in leadership pushing multilingualism, multiculturalism, when the Jews themselves, keep within their own group. The press, politicians, and scholars have blurred the ideological lines, and the institutions have engaged in revisionism. They have astonishingly made in the perception of the citizens, European and American conservatism to be ‘Fascists,’ Islamophobes, misogynists, xenophobes, &c. Well then, explain this lunacy?
“We are at present working discreetly with all our might to wrest this mysterious force called sovereignty out of the clutches of the local nation states of the world. All the time, we are denying with our lips what we are doing with our hands.” (Prof. Arnold J. Toynbee, June 1931, Speech before the Institute for the Study of International Affairs in Copenhagen.)
“The man of the future will be of mixed race. Today’s races and classes will gradually disappear owing to the vanishing of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, similar in its appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals. (…)
Instead of destroying European Jewry, Europe, against its own will, refined and educated this people into a future leader-nation through this artificial selection process. No wonder that this people, that escaped Ghetto-Prison, developed into a spiritual nobility of Europe. Therefore a gracious Providence provided Europe with a new race of nobility by the Grace of Spirit. This happened at the moment when Europe’s feudal aristocracy became dilapidated, and thanks to Jewish emancipation.” (Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi, Praktischer Idealismus [Practical Idealism], 1925, pp. 20, 23, 50)